Custom Windows - What is common practice when specifying?

Created by Vicki Marshall, Modified on Fri, 3 Mar, 2023 at 2:41 PM by Vicki Marshall


Region: All States


Assessor Question:


I'd like some information on what is common practice when specifying custom windows? If the plans don’t specify a supplier, can I simply put custom windows from a variety of suppliers that have the most appropriate U and SHGC?

 

For example, the lowest U value default window for Timber double glazed has quite a low SHGC compared to the custom windows available so can I choose custom versions to substitute. And if some of those suppliers do not have each of the various opening types that I require, can I specify the windows from a variety of suppliers just based on the U and SHGC.


TechLink Response:


  • Customs windows cannot be used when a window manufacture is not stated on the drawings. 
  • Default windows must be used. If the architect / builder / developer has chosen a window manufacture, have the drawing set amended to state the window manufacture. 

The NatHERS Tech note states;


If a custom window is specified on the design documentation that is not available in the NatHERS custom window library, assessors must model:

  • default window with the specified opening type; 
  • or an available custom window that meets all of the following parameters:
  • identical opening type (e.g. fixed, awning, casement, sliding) to the window specified on the documentation;
  • and a total window system U-value equal to, or greater than, the window specified on the documentation (e.g. if the U-value of the specified custom window is 3.0, the modelled window selected could be 3.5);
  • and a total window system Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) +/-5% of the window specified on the documentation.




Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article